Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Funny Stuff in Poilievre's Riding

 Pierre Poilievre's riding of Carlton had an astonishing 91 candidates on the ballot. I think that's a record. Obviously, there's some funny business going on. Most of those 91 candidates are independents or have no affiliation. Many of these people are protesting about our voting system. And I understand, there are frustrations with our voting system. But, targeting only one candidate (they claim that they couldn't get people in Carney's riding because he didn't announce it until it was too late) is problematic. Plus, I don't think it will do what they want it to do. It just annoyed and frustrated voters. Did it make a difference in the riding though? Well, when you look at the numbers on elections.ca, it seems like it did. When you count the votes for independents, they come out to around 922 votes. If you add that to Poilievre's existing vote count you get 40,507 which is still short of the Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy's 43,900. 

 

So, it is hard to say if it would have changed the outcome of the election. Maybe those 922 voters were confused. Maybe many couldn't care less about who one. Maybe they wouldn't have voted for the Liberals or Conservatives anyhow. Either way, this "voting protest" seems like a terrible way to do things. 



Tuesday, April 22, 2025

An Interesting Little Tidbit about Mentzelopoulos

 

The new affidavit, filed Wednesday by AHS’ senior vice president of clinical operations Sean Chilton, says the agency discovered last week that Mentzelopoulos had forwarded nearly a dozen emails from her work account to a personal email address the day before she was fired. Those emails, Chilton claims, “contain confidential information, privileged information, and business records” that Mentzelopoulos was not authorized to keep. 


From: Global News

AHS claims fired CEO kept confidential emails, seeking injunction | Globalnews.ca

Monday, April 21, 2025

Canada Election Polls Comparison


Comparison of the Main Election Polls






All data comes from the respective polling websites except for the  Nanos graphic which was made by me.

 

 

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

What is Reconciliation?

 


At its basic level, reconciliation is defined as  “the act of coming to an understanding and putting an end to hostility, as when former enemies agree to an amicable true”.[1]  Canada’s definition is based on the UN’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It advocates for a nation to nation and government to government relationship between the Indigenous peoples and Canada. As such, it would seem to state that the Indigenous are not a part of Canada but a separate country (or group of people) with whom the government must work.

That is an enormous idea already. But let’s break it down a bit. Basically, to my understanding, instead of treating the indigenous people as inferior or sovereign citizens of Canada, under rule of the Canadian government, they should be considered their own independent people with their own culture, government, and way of doing things that are equal to (and some would argue superior to) the “Canadian way”. This is very much in line with our Canadian multicultural identity. I remember being taught – somewhat smugly – in school that Canada was a multicultural country not a melting pot like the United States. Here in Canada, we not only allowed but encouraged and embraced many different cultures and ideas. So, logically, that idea applies to our Indigenous policies.

 

By right of previous stewardship and residence on the land now called Canada, the Natives have a superior right and culture – at least that’s what it feels like the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and similar documents seem to say. That is where I struggle. I understand that the indigenous people were colonized and that their culture was (mostly) destroyed) but just because they lived on this land prior to colonization does not make them inherently better than colonizers- no more than colonizers were inherently better than the Indigenous peoples. How can we based our decisions on the idea that that “Aboriginal rights are distinct and different from the rights of other Canadians.” [2] After all, section one of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states  that everyone has the:

  • fundamental freedoms, democratic rights
  • the right to live and seek employment anywhere in Canada
  • legal rights (life, liberty, and personal security)
  • equality rights for all [3]

 

Naturally, I must note that there is a bullet point on Aboriginal rights on the front page. That might really be the heart of the issue. Our Charter and other official legislation have this inherent contradiction. All people are equal, all people have equal rights. But some are more equal than others.



[1] Dictionary.com Reconciliation

[2] ictinc.ca blog  “Aboriginal Rights Title, and the Duty to Consult – A Primer, Aug 15, 2016

[3] https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rights-protected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html